Trump’s Memecoin Sparks Legal Debate but Stays Within U.S. Law

Donald Trump’s entry into cryptocurrency with the launch of his memecoin, TRUMP, has sparked discussions around its legality.
Crypto lawyer Anonwassielawyer analyzed the project, arguing that despite its unconventional nature, the token operates within the boundaries of U.S. securities law due to its speculative design.
Why TRUMP Isn’t a Security
Memecoins like TRUMP don’t meet the criteria of the Howey Test, which determines whether an asset qualifies as a security. To be classified as a security, a token must involve an investment of money in a common enterprise, with profits generated by someone else’s efforts. TRUMP lacks these features, functioning purely as a speculative asset with no inherent utility or economic project tied to its sales. According to Anonwassielawyer, this shields TRUMP from securities classification.
Comparing TRUMP to WLFI
While TRUMP is a straightforward memecoin, Trump’s other crypto project, World Liberty Finance (WLFI), operates under strict compliance measures. WLFI tokens are non-transferable for 12 months and structured to meet U.S. securities regulations, such as Regulation D and Regulation S. This stark difference highlights how regulatory frameworks vary between speculative and utility-driven projects.
Offshore Entities and Regulatory Perception
The use of offshore structures in crypto projects, often criticized as evasive, is primarily for governance and tax optimization, according to Anonwassielawyer. Even when operating offshore, tokens sold to U.S. investors remain under U.S. jurisdiction, though offshore structures can delay taxable events until assets are onshored.
The Broader Implications
Trump’s TRUMP token exemplifies how memecoins, despite their lack of intrinsic value, face less regulatory scrutiny compared to projects aiming to provide real utility. For the crypto industry, it highlights the need for caution and strict compliance, especially for tokens with financial or governance features. As Anonwassielawyer noted, “Speculation is one thing, but tokens with security-like elements must adhere to established rules.”